Do You Know Your Straw Man?
A third person story of how we got here, Names have been withheld or changed, to protect The integrity of Person(s) involved.
When you represent yourself in our modern day judicial system, you are not representing your
true self, the flesh and blood man or woman. You are considered to be representing quite another
“person,” i.e., your Straw Man, and you are at a very serious disadvantage if you do not
understand this fact. Later in the chapter titled, “My Trial,” you will see how desperate the de
facto judge was in his attempt to get me to say that I was going to “represent” myself. He wanted
me to have a fool for a client and make this fiction real. You will see how I confounded him in
his wicked design.
Your Straw Man is a distinct legal entity. It is sometimes referred to as a cestui que trust, French
for “he who trusts.” It is a “constructive trust,” supposedly “constructed” by operation of law, but
this is nonsense. Such a trust is really only the “appearance” of a trust. It looks as if it is a trust,
but has no creator/trustor/granter/settlor, the flesh-and-blood being normally responsible for
bringing a trust into being.
More commonly, your Straw Man is referred to as a juristic person. It is treated as a separate legal
entity, like a corporation, though it is only a corporate name. It benefits the creator, i.e. the U.S.
Government, because the creator can then accomplish things in the name of the straw man that
would not otherwise be permitted, such as secretly acquire property, do business with one’s
enemies, and—deprive us of our rights.
“From the earliest times the law has enforced rights and exacted liabilities by
utilizing a corporate concept—by recognizing, that is, juristic persons other than
human beings. The theories by which this mode of legal operation has developed,
has been justified, qualified, and defined are the subject matter of a very sizable
library. The historic roots of a particular society, economic pressures, philosophic
notions, all have had their share in the law’s response to the ways of men in
carrying on their affairs through what is now the familiar device of the
corporation. — Attribution of legal rights and duties to a juristic person other
than man is necessarily a metaphorical process. And none the worse for it. No
doubt, ‘Metaphors in law are to be narrowly watched’” (Cardoza, J., in
Berkey v. Third Avenue R. Co., 244 N.Y. 84, 94; emphasis added).
“But all instruments of thought should be narrowly watched lest they be abused
and fail in their service to reason” (U.S. v. SCOPHONY CORP. OF AMERICA,
333 U.S. 795; 68 S. Ct. 855; 1948 U.S.; mphasis added).
The term Straw Man is also used in commercial and property contexts when a transfer is made to
a third party, the Straw Man,
“. . . simply for the purpose of retransferring to the transferor in order to
accomplish some other purpose not otherwise permitted” (Barron’s Law
Dictionary 3rd Ed; emphasis added).
One “purpose not otherwise permitted” is “extraction of income tax from a sovereign,” i.e. you—
something for which you would not otherwise give consent. All income is “corporate income,”
and the straw man is a dummy public corporation. Because the straw man is registered (birth
certificate), and because most people can’t seem to find work without using his labor license
(Social Security Card), and you cannot have a bank account except through his serial number
(Social Security Account Number), taxes are relatively easily monitored, assessed, and collected.
All claims made against you, both civil and criminal, are instituted in your straw man’s TRADE
NAME, which is held in custody by the State Registrar in the State in which you were born.
One of the reasons this is such an advantage to these conspirators is because legal fictions don’t
have rights, only privileges that their government agents can rule on. They seem to be dealing
with you, but legally they are not. When you are offered a presentment, such as a traffic ticket,
and if you sign it as if you were really the party being presented, in a legal sense, you are duped
into becoming the surety or accommodation party for this legal fiction, which, in most cases, they
control. All licenses, permits, bank accounts, credit cards, tax returns, pay checks, even utility
bills are in your Straw Man’s fictitious name. When you sign a traffic citation, or a promissory
note for a mortgage you are the accommodation endorser. Your Straw Man is the accommodated
party. You unknowingly admit that you are the fictional entity in every commercial transaction
you take part in, and that includes every dealing you have with government. It is a sinister back
door method used to avoid acknowledging our rights. We, the unfortunate counterparts of these
straw men, are taken along for the ride as the supposed surety, co-surety, accommodation party
and collateral for this fiction.
Another important key to understand is the principle of Standing. Lets say you had a complaint
about how the modern day courtroom wizards are treating gun owners. You saddle up your
favorite horse and gallop over to the Supreme Court building to voice your complaint. Now, what
are they going to say to you? “Get out of here you idiot. You don’t have any ‘Standing’ here.’” In
other words, “You don’t have any ‘business’ here. You were never ‘charged’ with having
possession of a gun, and you haven’t gone through the lower court process before coming here,
not that we would ‘accept’ your complaint anyway, as we do not want to provide a ruling which
might support your belief that you do in fact have a right to keep and bear arms.”
Now this is all very logical, and necessary for a smooth running judicial process, but in today’s
courtrooms, the reason you don’t have any ‘standing’ is because you are not the ‘person’ who
was ‘charged.’ The Straw Man has no rights they need to concern themselves with violating,
and you, the flesh and blood man or woman, have no ‘business’ there, so you can be ignored
There is evidence that these “artificial persons” originated as a result of “The Maternity Act of
1921.” This “Act” was supposed to help Mothers, and for “other purposes.” One of these “other
purposes” was Birth Registration.
Now, prior to this deceitful act, Mothers did a pretty good job of keeping track of their children,
and I doubt that any of them believed that they needed any government assistance with this
responsibility. There are, no doubt, some moral degenerates in our society who could use some
assistance keeping track of their children. I have heard it said that some men have more concern
over the breeding of their dogs than they do of their own children, and some women obviously
have the same disregard, however, assistance with their problem would have to be of a religious,
not political nature. Regardless, that was not what this Maternity Act was about at all.
Looking up the word “Birth” reveals an interesting point, admitted in Black’s 1st:
Birth: “The act of being born or wholly brought into separate existence.”
“A man or a woman is ‘born.’ Straw men are ‘wholly brought into separate
existence.’ Each event qualifies as a birth. The Birth Certificate documents a
muddied mixture of the two events that allows the system to both claim that it is
‘your’ birth certificate yet also claim to hold title to (not ownership of) the
corporately colored straw man” (RIL 2nd Ed., p. 93; emphasis added).
Black’s 1st reveals other interesting and related points. Under “birth record,” the definition refers
to “persons birth,” While under “birth certificate” the definition refers to “one’s birth,” and under
the word “one” we discover that this means the flesh-and-blood man or woman. “Person” again,
means the artificial or juristic person (Reference to this is also found in RIL 2nd., p. 94).
A birth certificate is only a “certificate of title” to your straw man, and confirms only that the
issuer of the certificate held the actual title at the time of registration. The issuer may have since
assigned or sold the original birth document. A receipt of the kind described in subdivision (2) of
section 7-201 is a warehouse receipt. Therefore, a birth certificate—a document of title—is a
warehouse receipt (See UCC 7-202). The bankers presently hold title. You are the collateral.
“The contemporary certificate issued by a state or county government is not the
original, however. It is merely a certified token of the real thing, which is held by
the issuer” (RIL p. 28).
All is not lost, however. The banker’s claim of a security interest in everything associated with
your Straw Man, by way of your Birth Record, is by presumption only. There never was a bona
fide contract, as there was not full disclosure, a vital element to a valid contract.
Many would be surprised to learn that a Birth Certificate is a negotiable instrument. In
America the original Birth Document is generally created at the county level (sometimes city
level) via Birth documents from the hospital (for which the hospital receives $4,000 from the
county for causing the registration of the birth) and passed to the state and federal levels. It is
believed that these are passed on to the U.S. Dept. of Commerce (which is probably paying the
County), and there is evidence that they are on file there, but it seems that they are filed under an
unknown name. Some suggest that they may be kept in Puerto Rico, which of course is District of
Columbia territory (RIL 2nd Ed., pp. 28, 93).
Some years ago a man in Santa Barbara, California managed to obtain his original birth record
document from the Department of Commerce by way of a Freedom of Information Act request.
He reported endorsements of seventeen different foreign countries on the document. There may
also be other types of birth documents used by the U.S. Government, and others, to obtain loans
of credit (CC3 p. 107).
Your Birth Certificate is one kind of security instrument used by the US Government to obtain
loans from its creditor, the Federal Reserve System (RIL 2nd Ed., p. 93). Many who have studied
this say that back in 1933 these were determined to be worth $630,000.00, which was supposedly
based upon the value of the future labor of each person. By the late 1930s the value had risen to
Supposedly, upon notification of the receipt of a new Certificate of Live Birth at the Department
of Commerce, the Department of the Treasury takes out a loan from the Fed for $1 million
(current determined value), and purchases a bond from the Department of Commerce, which then
invests the funds in either the stock market or bond market. These certificates are bundled
together into sets and placed as securities on the open market where they are then purchased by
the Federal Reserve and/or foreign bankers. The purchaser is the “holder” of the “Title.” This
process makes every person in this jurisdiction a bond servant.
“They take your birth certificate and put a bond with it, which puts you in the
warehouse of the federal corporation. That allowed the corporate U.S.
government to create the credit they needed to lend to the Federal Reserve Bank.
Your Straw Man was made a ward of the State” (Rice McCloud in Tax Truth
News January 1, 2002 p. 2).
These Straw Men are, at least in a legal sense, the property of the system, because they were
created by them, and most of us have not made a contrary claim. The problem with this situation
is, if they elect to fine, enslave, or kill the abstract Straw Man, then you, the physical biological
being, suffer the consequences in reality.
To Be Continued :